View source

From WikiPathways

for Thread:Was that revert in WP2849 intentional? (1)

Jump to: navigation, search

There have been no changes to this discussion for at least 30 days. If it is concluded, you may want to write a summary.

You do not have permission to edit pages, for the following reason:

You are not allowed to execute the action you have requested.

You can view and copy the source of this page:

Dear Jun, I noted a revert of a change you made, which was part of the Curated Collection version:

http://www.wikipathways.org/index.php/Pathway:WP2849 (revision 77636)

Was that revert of an earlier change you made intentional? If so, then I will update the curation tag to the latest version.

Return to Thread:Was that revert in WP2849 intentional? (1).

Hi Egon, I was working with Jun on this pathway. Indeed, we realized that we were adding mouse-specific markers and decided to revert. I forgot to update the tags afterwards though. Good catch! I just updated them now. AlexanderPico 15:48, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

AlexanderPico (Talk | contribs)

15:48, 1 October 2014

Reply

Retrieved from "https://classic.wikipathways.org/index.php/Thread:Was_that_revert_in_WP2849_intentional%3F_%281%29"

Views

Personal tools

Log in / create account

search

Toolbox