View source

From WikiPathways

Jump to: navigation, search


Sorting order:
Start a new discussion
View archived threads

Not a biological process? (1)

There have been no changes to this discussion for at least 30 days. If it is concluded, you may want to write a summary.

Thomas, you added the tag "not a biological process", but I do think this represents a biological process. And although it doesn't contain genes / proteins (yet), it could function very well as a meta pathway, linking to other pathways.

It looks like a physiological pathway to me, which (as we discussed in the past) isn't within the scope of wikipathways. I'm fine with keeping it, but I definitely want to keep the tag to be able to distinguish it from molecular pathways.

Translate to english? (1)

There have been no changes to this discussion for at least 30 days. If it is concluded, you may want to write a summary.

You do not have permission to edit pages, for the following reason:

You are not allowed to execute the action you have requested.

You can view and copy the source of this page:

Return to Pathway Talk:WP1721.

Retrieved from "https://classic.wikipathways.org/index.php/Pathway_Talk:WP1721"
Personal tools