View source

From WikiPathways

for Pathway Talk:WP1721

Jump to: navigation, search

[Edit↑]
[History↑]

Start a new discussion

View archived threads

Not a biological process? (1)

History

There have been no changes to this discussion for at least 30 days. If it is concluded, you may want to write a summary.

Thomas, you added the tag "not a biological process", but I do think this represents a biological process. And although it doesn't contain genes / proteins (yet), it could function very well as a meta pathway, linking to other pathways.

MartijnVanIersel (Talk | contribs)

11:03, 25 September 2010

Reply

You do not have permission to edit pages, for the following reason:

You are not allowed to execute the action you have requested.

You can view and copy the source of this page:

It looks like a physiological pathway to me, which (as we discussed in the past) isn't within the scope of wikipathways. I'm fine with keeping it, but I definitely want to keep the tag to be able to distinguish it from molecular pathways.

Return to Pathway Talk:WP1721.

Translate to english? (1)

History

There have been no changes to this discussion for at least 30 days. If it is concluded, you may want to write a summary.

Hey Karin

We really focus on English content for WikiPathways, to reach a wider audience. Would you mind translating everything to english?

Martijn

MartijnVanIersel (Talk | contribs)

11:00, 25 September 2010

Reply

Retrieved from "https://classic.wikipathways.org/index.php/Pathway_Talk:WP1721"

Views

Personal tools

Log in / create account

search

Toolbox