View source
From WikiPathways
1. Yes it's automatically generated. You can delete the curation tag at any time, if you feel you've addressed as many of the issues as possible. Note that our bots apply new tags after every edit, so if you're planning more edits, wait until you're done to delete the tag. 2. Up to you whether you use "geneProduct" or "protein". Both are accurate. 3. "catalysis" is appropriate. The system does not have a preference, per se, it has an alias database with gene and protein IDs. You can choose whichever you find most effective. Downstream analysis tools should offer ways to convert/unify if necessary. 4. You can not annotate a datanode with 2 IDs. You can add the terms you've looked up as a comment on the node, but only 1 ID is accepted for mapping. And I recommend using the one in the database so we can support linkouts and ID mapping, etc.
You do not have permission to edit pages, for the following reason:
You can view and copy the source of this page:
Return to Thread:Substantive changes (3).
Use the ID you think is best. The "unable to load external refs" sounds like a bug on our end. If you found it in the database and it produces external references in edit mode, then you're all set. As for the curation tag, the "correction" is to simply remove it. Just click the little red 'x' after you're done making your edits. It won't appear again until it's triggered by future edits.
The pathway is final for now and the paper submitted. I picked the Entrez Gene IDs as we needed to submit the paper and the UniProt IDs did not generate links to other databases in the live version, only in the edit mode. I would prefer UniProt IDs though as it are enzymes and not genes, so if there is a fix let me know.
Great. In your paper, be aware of the difference between citing the pathway (e.g., http://wikipathways.org/index.php/Pathway:WP78) and citing your particular revision (e.g., http://wikipathways.org/index.php?title=Pathway:WP78&oldid=47741). The former may (and will) change over time... it's a wiki after all, and knowledge evolves; while the latter will always refer to that particular version no matter what changes follow. You may want to cite both depending on the purpose of the citation. AlexanderPico 21:03, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
