View source
From WikiPathways
There have been no changes to this discussion for at least 30 days. If it is concluded, you may want to write a summary.
The pathway looks great! After reviewing the original figure, I have a few suggestions: - For the inhibition of Wnt in the extracellular space (DKK3 etc), it would preferred if the inhibition arrow pointed to a copy of Wnt in the extracellular space instead of to the binding arrow. That is a more direct way of representing the information. If you keep the current representation, you could use a dashed arrow instead. - The representation of the destruction complex (with APC/Axin) and how it binds to beta-catenin could be improved. The arrow going from FZD/LRP to beta-catenin should be removed, I think. And while the complex facilitates destruction of beta-catenin like you illustrated, it is doing so while bound to beta-catenin. So I think a representation that is more similar to the one in the figure is more correct, with beta-catenin as part of the complex, with an arrow pointing to a mim-degradation object. - Inside the nucleus, you could use a mim-transcription-translation arrow instead of the regular arrow.
You do not have permission to edit pages, for the following reason:
You can view and copy the source of this page:
Return to Thread:Pathway looks great! (1).
