Thread:Better way of representing catalysis (1)

From WikiPathways

from Pathway Talk:WP3666
Viewing a history listing.
Jump to: navigation, search
05:47, 26 June 2016Egonw (Talk | contribs)New reply created
15:55, 21 June 2016Jacobwindsor (Talk | contribs)New reply created(Respond discussion)
13:34, 20 June 2016Egonw (Talk | contribs)Comment text edited
13:33, 20 June 2016Egonw (Talk | contribs)New thread created
«newerolder»

There have been no changes to this discussion for at least 30 days. If it is concluded, you may want to write a summary.

Hi Jacob,

nice to see you found your way around. One possible improvement is how to draw the catalysis. I just updated the help pages a bit, but please have a look at them, because ideally, the catalysis looks like this:

Image:Label3DataNode.png

Grtz,

Egon

Thanks for the help Egon.

To be honest, I was just copying the KEGG pathway for the time being and did not really know that I drew a catalysis. I'll look into it now.

Regards, Jacob

Yeah, no worries! I too have discussions like this with more senior editors and curators :)

Retrieved from "https://classic.wikipathways.org/index.php/Thread:Better_way_of_representing_catalysis_%281%29"
Personal tools