Thread:Not a biological process? (1)

From WikiPathways

from Pathway Talk:WP1721
Viewing a history listing.
Jump to: navigation, search
18:41, 25 September 2010Thomas (Talk | contribs)New reply created
11:03, 25 September 2010MartijnVanIersel (Talk | contribs)New thread created
«newerolder»

There have been no changes to this discussion for at least 30 days. If it is concluded, you may want to write a summary.

Thomas, you added the tag "not a biological process", but I do think this represents a biological process. And although it doesn't contain genes / proteins (yet), it could function very well as a meta pathway, linking to other pathways.

It looks like a physiological pathway to me, which (as we discussed in the past) isn't within the scope of wikipathways. I'm fine with keeping it, but I definitely want to keep the tag to be able to distinguish it from molecular pathways.

Personal tools