Thread:Using GO terms for datanode xrefs (1)
From WikiPathways
from Pathway Talk:WP2565
Revision as of 21:20, 12 September 2013.
This is the thread's initial revision.
This is the thread's initial revision.
There have been no changes to this discussion for at least 30 days. If it is concluded, you may want to write a summary.
Hi Andra, I'm not sure this is a good use of GO terms. It's actually a "bug" if they are showing up in search results for datanode xrefs. They were intended for secondary identifiers for backpage annotations only. And even in the case where the exact gene is not known, filling it in with a GO term implicates a lot of genes in that role, which is not likely to be accurate either. What do you think? - Alex Pico
