Thread:Not a biological process? (1)

From WikiPathways

Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 18:41, 25 September 2010.
The highlighted comment was created in this revision.

There have been no changes to this discussion for at least 30 days. If it is concluded, you may want to write a summary.

Thomas, you added the tag "not a biological process", but I do think this represents a biological process. And although it doesn't contain genes / proteins (yet), it could function very well as a meta pathway, linking to other pathways.

It looks like a physiological pathway to me, which (as we discussed in the past) isn't within the scope of wikipathways. I'm fine with keeping it, but I definitely want to keep the tag to be able to distinguish it from molecular pathways.

Personal tools