Thread:Was that revert in WP2849 intentional? (1)
From WikiPathways
from User talk:Jseita
There have been no changes to this discussion for at least 30 days. If it is concluded, you may want to write a summary.
Dear Jun, I noted a revert of a change you made, which was part of the Curated Collection version:
http://www.wikipathways.org/index.php/Pathway:WP2849 (revision 77636)
Was that revert of an earlier change you made intentional? If so, then I will update the curation tag to the latest version.
Hi Egon, I was working with Jun on this pathway. Indeed, we realized that we were adding mouse-specific markers and decided to revert. I forgot to update the tags afterwards though. Good catch! I just updated them now. AlexanderPico 15:48, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
