Thread:Literature references (1)
From WikiPathways
from Pathway Talk:WP2909
There have been no changes to this discussion for at least 30 days. If it is concluded, you may want to write a summary.
Only a fraction of the literature references seem to be encoded properly. I'm not sure if this is due to how they were entered or a bug, but this will take some work to fix. Perhaps you could provide an independent list of papers (or just pubmed ids) and associated nodes/interactions? Then I could go through and correct the references. As they are now, they appear inaccurate and don't link out properly. AlexanderPico 19:42, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
