Thread:Literature references (1)
From WikiPathways
from Pathway Talk:WP2909
Revision as of 19:42, 4 April 2015.
This is the thread's initial revision.
This is the thread's initial revision.
There have been no changes to this discussion for at least 30 days. If it is concluded, you may want to write a summary.
Only a fraction of the literature references seem to be encoded properly. I'm not sure if this is due to how they were entered or a bug, but this will take some work to fix. Perhaps you could provide an independent list of papers (or just pubmed ids) and associated nodes/interactions? Then I could go through and correct the references. As they are now, they appear inaccurate and don't link out properly. AlexanderPico 19:42, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
