Thread:Disease ontology (1)

From WikiPathways

Jump to: navigation, search

You do not have permission to edit pages, for the following reasons:

  • You are not allowed to execute the action you have requested.
  • WikiPathways has restricted the ability to create new pages. You can go back and edit an existing page, or log in or create an account.

Return to Thread:Disease ontology (1).

There have been no changes to this discussion for at least 30 days. If it is concluded, you may want to write a summary.

I noticed that a lot of pathways that are not really disease pathways are annotated with the disease ontology. This case for example, has "disease of response to stimulus", but it's really just a cell signaling pathway.

By that argumentation, any signaling pathway is automatically also a "disease of response to stimulus". But I think that is very redundant. I feel there must be something specific about the diseased state in the pathway in order for it to qualify for a term from the disease ontology. And a lot of annotations from the disease ontology annotations should be replaced by pathway ontology annotations.

Do we have a guideline on this?

Personal tools